Alternate careers for medical graduates and house officers in Malaysia

@#Introduction: In recent years, many unresolved issues pertaining to house officers in Malaysia have led to a longer waiting time and a ‘glut’ of medical graduates with a surprising 20% dropout amongst those who join the housemanship programme. This appears to reflect the changing times, mindsets and work expectations of millennials who comprise this cohort reflecting a need to consider possibilities of career shifts especially so in these uncertain times. This study explores the perceptions, awareness and interest in alternative career options amongst recent graduates and house officers. Materials and Methods: This was a study done between 2018 and 2019 using a questionnaire which was shared on various social platforms. Data analysis was done using Excel spreadsheet. Results: A total of 450 house officers and 657 medical graduates responded. Expectedly 66.8% claimed lifelong passion whilst another 12.1% claimed family influence as their reason to do medicine. Most were aware of their career challenges and 40% of them were keen to consider career change and reskilling indicating a possible shift from traditional expectations of a medical career. Conclusion: Whilst medicine is often considered a true calling, current challenges will require mental and emotional flexibility to explore other career opportunities. Thus, engagement programmes should be directed at medical graduates and house officers to identify and support those open to career transitions. This will help address current issues of internship bottleneck and rising dropout rates amongst internees. Early career change engagements will give them insight into their true career goals whilst opening up opportunities for those who wish to change.

Heterogeneity in studies of p16 in cervical lesions in different Malaysian institutions: Time to consider collaborative study

@#Introduction: Clinical decision making becomes difficult when clinical and methodological heterogeneity does not permit synthesis of results of multiple small studies. Aim: For studies done in Malaysia, to identity the sample sizes and heterogeneity present in the various studies which used p16 in evaluating lesions of the cervix. To evaluate if it would be possible for a single study to answer the various questions posed by the original authors. To highlight areas where the design features of future studies can be optimised. Materials and Methods: Various databases were searched using synonyms for p16 AND cervix AND Malaysia. These were assessed for broad conformity to a Diagnostic Test Accuracy format. Methodological and clinical heterogeneity indicators were extracted into standardised fields. Results: There were 5 studies eligible for inclusion. Each sought to study different aspects of the disease such as diagnostic grade stratification and pathogenesis. The study type broadly conformed to a Diagnostic Test Accuracy format. The study design used was either consecutive or non-consecutive. Sample size ranged from 75 to 201. Clinical heterogeneity was present in the choice of controls with some using normal and some using inflamed tissue. Methodological heterogeneity in applying the reference test, index test and different antibody clones were present. Conclusion: There was both clinical and methodological heterogeneity making synthesis of studies difficult. It is possible to design a study which would be able to answer all the questions posed by the original authors with internal validity while at the same time increasing sample size.